<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://nuclearstreet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Atomic Insights</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/default.aspx</link><description>&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;"&gt;On Atomic Insights Blog, Rod Adams discusses energy supplies, energy technology, and energy politics from an atomic point of view. &lt;/span&gt;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>PBMR Update - Green Light Given to Graphite Production at SGL Carbon</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/29/pbmr-update-green-light-given-to-graphite-production-at-sgl-carbon.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3184</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3184</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/29/pbmr-update-green-light-given-to-graphite-production-at-sgl-carbon.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have been publishing Atomic Insights since 1995 and have not yet published a press release article. I am going to break that string today. A few minutes ago, I received the following from Tom Ferreira - PBMR Corporate Communications. It is interesting enough to publish directly without editing: Production of graphite feedstock for the PBMR Demonstration Power Plant on track Production of graphite...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/29/pbmr-update-green-light-given-to-graphite-production-at-sgl-carbon.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3184" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Freakonomics Discussion on the Delay in Accepting New Technology Like Nuclear Power</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/29/freakonomics-discussion-on-the-delay-in-accepting-new-technology-like-nuclear-power.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3182</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3182</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/29/freakonomics-discussion-on-the-delay-in-accepting-new-technology-like-nuclear-power.aspx#comments</comments><description>Bill Tucker, author of Terrestrial Energy (warning: Terrestrial Energy has a fascinating intro video that plays automatically unless you skip it) has produced a series of posts for the Freakonomics blog hosted by the New York Times. The comments are being moderated - which slows down the conversation, but elevates it to something worth reading. On Bill&amp;#39;s most recent of the three guest posts, titled...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/29/freakonomics-discussion-on-the-delay-in-accepting-new-technology-like-nuclear-power.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3182" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Depleted Cranium has a Good Discussion Going About Wind Energy Limitations</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/28/depleted-cranium-has-a-good-discussion-going-about-wind-energy-limitations.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3170</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3170</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/28/depleted-cranium-has-a-good-discussion-going-about-wind-energy-limitations.aspx#comments</comments><description>I encourage you all to visit the active discussion going on at Depleted Cranium about wind energy limitations. Here is a sample: I shouldn’t complain though. I’m glad to see that wind energy is finally getting some of the criticism it deserves in the mainstream media. Just like biofuels started getting called on its various empty claims a couple of months ago, the wind is shifting on wind power (pun...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/28/depleted-cranium-has-a-good-discussion-going-about-wind-energy-limitations.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3170" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shaw Group Announces Nuclear Component Manufacturing Plant Joint Venture</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/28/shaw-group-announces-nuclear-component-manufacturing-plant-joint-venture.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3171</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3171</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/28/shaw-group-announces-nuclear-component-manufacturing-plant-joint-venture.aspx#comments</comments><description>Shaw Group , which has a 20% ownership stake in Westinghouse Electric Company LLC , has announced a new plant that will build reactor components to be shipped via barge to new construction sites. The plant, destined for Lake Charles, Louisiana , will be a joint venture between Shaw and Westinghouse with about $210 million in assistance spread over 10 years from the state of Louisiana. To obtain the...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/28/shaw-group-announces-nuclear-component-manufacturing-plant-joint-venture.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3171" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Steve Darden on Seeker Blog - CBO generation cost study</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/26/steve-darden-on-seeker-blog-cbo-generation-cost-study.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3159</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3159</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/26/steve-darden-on-seeker-blog-cbo-generation-cost-study.aspx#comments</comments><description>Steve Darden at SeekerBlog.com has some thoughts worth a read in his post titled CBO Study: Nuclear Power’s Role in Generating Electricity . You might also want to visit the Wall Street Journal&amp;#39;s Environmental Capital Blog post titled Going Nuclear: Will Dems Support Nukes To Fight Climate Change? . That one contains some interesting comments that lead me to believe that the pro nuclear message...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/26/steve-darden-on-seeker-blog-cbo-generation-cost-study.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3159" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Wall+Street+Journal/default.aspx">Wall Street Journal</category></item><item><title>Better than a smoking gun - straightforward ad against nuclear power from coal industry in AU</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/26/better-than-a-smoking-gun-straightforward-ad-against-nuclear-power-from-coal-industry-in-au.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3158</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3158</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/26/better-than-a-smoking-gun-straightforward-ad-against-nuclear-power-from-coal-industry-in-au.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have some very engaged readers. Some of you even follow up if you send something interesting and I do not get around to sharing it with all of you. Daniel sent me a scan of an advertisement that appeared in the Courier-Mail out of Queensland, Australia in November 2007. it is a very straightforward effort by the coal industry to scare people about nuclear power - not really so much about the typical...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/26/better-than-a-smoking-gun-straightforward-ad-against-nuclear-power-from-coal-industry-in-au.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3158" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Australia/default.aspx">Australia</category></item><item><title>Atomic Entrepreneur on StartupStoryRadio</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/25/atomic-entrepreneur-on-startupstoryradio.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3150</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3150</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/25/atomic-entrepreneur-on-startupstoryradio.aspx#comments</comments><description>A couple of weeks ago, I was interviewed by Rob McNealy, who runs a very informative podcast called StartUpStoryRadio. You can find the recorded interview at Alternative Energy Sources with Rod Adams of Adams Atomic Engines . Read More......(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/25/atomic-entrepreneur-on-startupstoryradio.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3150" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Alternative+Energy+Sources/default.aspx">Alternative Energy Sources</category></item><item><title>Smoking Gun Part 11 - Scargill, National Union of Mineworkers, blasts Monbiot for acceptance of nuclear</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/25/smoking-gun-part-11-scargill-national-union-of-mineworkers-blasts-monbiot-for-acceptance-of-nuclear.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3146</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3146</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/25/smoking-gun-part-11-scargill-national-union-of-mineworkers-blasts-monbiot-for-acceptance-of-nuclear.aspx#comments</comments><description>Arthur Scargill, former leaders of the UK&amp;#39;s National Union of Mineworkers, published a commentary on August 8, 2008 on Guardian.co.uk that qualifies as one of the clearest examples of a professional coal advocate trashing nuclear power for economic reasons. Here is Mr. Scargill&amp;#39;s view of nuclear power and his reaction when a long time critic made a statement that accepted that nuclear power...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/25/smoking-gun-part-11-scargill-national-union-of-mineworkers-blasts-monbiot-for-acceptance-of-nuclear.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3146" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/UK/default.aspx">UK</category></item><item><title>George Monbiot - a lifelong nuclear critic - indicates reluctant acceptance</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/23/george-monbiot-a-lifelong-nuclear-critic-indicates-reluctant-acceptance.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3142</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3142</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/23/george-monbiot-a-lifelong-nuclear-critic-indicates-reluctant-acceptance.aspx#comments</comments><description>George Monbiot, a longtime critic of nuclear power, recently made a statement that was almost a ringing endorsement considering the source. On August 5, 2008, he published an article titled The stakes could not be higher. Everything hinges on stopping coal in The Guardian . Here is a quote from that article: I have now reached the point at which I no longer care whether or not the answer is nuclear...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/23/george-monbiot-a-lifelong-nuclear-critic-indicates-reluctant-acceptance.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3142" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/George+Monbiot/default.aspx">George Monbiot</category></item><item><title>My apologies to Joe Romm - this time, I agree with him (kind of)</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/23/my-apologies-to-joe-romm-this-time-i-agree-with-him-kind-of.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3143</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3143</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/23/my-apologies-to-joe-romm-this-time-i-agree-with-him-kind-of.aspx#comments</comments><description>About a week ago, I posted a link to a discussion about the world&amp;#39;s energy situation hosted by The Economist . One of the scheduled featured debaters was Joe Romm . I assumed that he would provide commentary that strongly discouraged the use of nuclear power - that is his normal position. I was wrong and apologize. A couple of days ago, I finally got around to visiting the debate myself. I had...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/23/my-apologies-to-joe-romm-this-time-i-agree-with-him-kind-of.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3143" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Joe+Romm/default.aspx">Joe Romm</category></item><item><title>Senator James Webb visits Lynchburg, Areva, Babcock and Wilcox and Central Virginia Community College</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/22/senator-james-webb-visits-lynchburg-areva-babcock-and-wilcox-and-central-virginia-community-college.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3134</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3134</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/22/senator-james-webb-visits-lynchburg-areva-babcock-and-wilcox-and-central-virginia-community-college.aspx#comments</comments><description>Senator James Webb, a former Marine who holds an engineering degree &amp;quot;that he did not want&amp;quot; from the US Naval Academy, spent two days in Lynchburg VA (Aug 20, 21) getting an education about their nuclear industry and education programs . He toured Areva&amp;#39;s engineering and development center where he got briefed on the availability of nuclear fuel recycling technology. He also participated...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/22/senator-james-webb-visits-lynchburg-areva-babcock-and-wilcox-and-central-virginia-community-college.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3134" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Areva/default.aspx">Areva</category><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/babcock+and+wilcox/default.aspx">babcock and wilcox</category></item><item><title>Fresno Nuclear Group making progress</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/21/fresno-nuclear-group-making-progress.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3133</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3133</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/21/fresno-nuclear-group-making-progress.aspx#comments</comments><description>The Fresno Nuclear Energy Group has made an agreement with the Westlands Water District to study the feasibility of building a dual unit nuclear plant on about 500 idled acres. Westlands has about 100,000 idle acres, much of which was taken out of production due to increasing salt concentrations. Apparently, Fresno Nuclear Energy Group wants to use grey water from the water treatment plants to cool...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/21/fresno-nuclear-group-making-progress.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3133" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Fresno+Nuclear+Energy+Group/default.aspx">Fresno Nuclear Energy Group</category></item><item><title>Recalling the IFR experiments</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/19/recalling-the-ifr-experiments.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3117</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3117</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/19/recalling-the-ifr-experiments.aspx#comments</comments><description>I got notified via a Google Alert on &amp;quot;small nuclear power plants&amp;quot; about a post on a blog that I had not previously visited. The post was titled The Environmentalists Nuclear Debate (2) Mark Lynas . The post provided a link to a very interesting article by Mark Lynas in the New Republic titled How nuclear power can save the planet that I highly recommend reading. (I just checked out the comments...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/19/recalling-the-ifr-experiments.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3117" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/small+nuclear+power+plants/default.aspx">small nuclear power plants</category></item><item><title>Economist Debate - Solving the World's Energy Crisis</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/19/economist-debate-solving-the-world-s-energy-crisis.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3109</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3109</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/19/economist-debate-solving-the-world-s-energy-crisis.aspx#comments</comments><description>I received an email invitation to help The Economist advertise a &amp;quot;two-week long online, Oxford-style debate&amp;quot; . I am happy to oblige, and actually feel kind of honored that Atomic Insights was included in the list of bloggers invited to help such a major magazine capture reader attention. The debate proposition is: “This house believes that we can solve our energy problems with existing technologies...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/19/economist-debate-solving-the-world-s-energy-crisis.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3109" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/The+Economist/default.aspx">The Economist</category></item><item><title>Steven Milloy Warns Nukes About "Environmentalist" Alliance - He Misreads Motives</title><link>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/17/steven-milloy-warns-nukes-about-quot-environmentalist-quot-alliance-he-misreads-motives.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f73e6dbf-9679-481f-8c46-b830edef8b45:3099</guid><dc:creator>Atomic Insights Blog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3099</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/17/steven-milloy-warns-nukes-about-quot-environmentalist-quot-alliance-he-misreads-motives.aspx#comments</comments><description>A good friend sent me a link to Steven Milloy - of JunkScience.com - opinion piece titled Environmentalists Prompt Nuclear Power Wake-Up Call published on August 14, 2008 on FoxNews.com. Here is the lede from that piece What did the nuclear power industry get for playing footsie with the &amp;quot;greens&amp;quot; on global warming? A knife in the back, it looks like. The greens now are saying that emission...(&lt;a href="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/2008/08/17/steven-milloy-warns-nukes-about-quot-environmentalist-quot-alliance-he-misreads-motives.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://nuclearstreet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3099" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://nuclearstreet.com/blogs/atomic_insights/archive/tags/Steven+Milloy/default.aspx">Steven Milloy</category></item></channel></rss>